Marva Collins' Adaptive Attribution System
Attributional theory posits that our explanations for success and failure are not random, which can be categorized along three critical dimensions.
- Locus of Control: Is the cause internal or external?
- Stability: Is the cause stable (permanent and unchanging) or unstable (temporary)?
- Controllability: Is the cause within my control or outside of it?
The most resilient individuals are the ones who turn setbacks into fuel, who consistently make attributions that are internal, unstable, and controllable. In the following two examples, we can have a look at Marva Collins' adaptive attribution.
Example I: Explaining Systemic Failure
Marva Collins spent 14 years teaching in Chicago's public schools, a system she watched fail its students, particularly those from low-income Black communities. She believed that the system was riddled with maladaptive attributions. The dominant narrative explained student failure with causes that were internal (the children are disadvantaged, slow, problematic), stable (they have fixed low ability), and uncontrollable (teachers are limited in helping/changing those students). This attributional style triggers teachers' emotions of pity, hopelessness, and resignation, which do not lead to long-term motivation.
However, Marva Collins refused this story. She attributed the system's failure to causes that were:
- External: The problem was not the children, but the education system or the inappropriate instruction. It was the poor teaching methods, the diluted curriculum, and, most critically, the criminally low expectations that caused disadvantaged students' failure.
- Unstable: These failing methods were not unchangeable; they were simply bad practices that could be replaced with effective ones.
- Controllable: Unlike other teachers in her school, Marva Collins believed the solution was within her control. She could create a new environment, implement a classical curriculum, and set astronomically high standards.
For Marva Collins, this attributional shift was her psychological engine. Instead of the despair and burnout that crippled so many of her colleagues, she felt a potent mix of righteous anger and an unwavering sense of purpose. Anger results from perceiving a negative outcome as controllable by others. But she channeled that energy inward, toward her own controllable actions. This long-term motivation was so powerful that it propelled her to start her own school, Westside Preparatory School, in her own home.
Example II: Explaining Student Struggle
The true test of her framework came inside her classroom, with students who had been labeled "unteachable" and "dyslexic." Where others saw permanent deficits, Marva saw only temporary obstacles in those students. Then she instilled what she called an "I-can" mentality in her students' beliefs against the "I-can't" attributions they had learned.
For example, a student struggling to read the word "beautiful," pronouncing it in a wrong way. The System may attribute that "this child has a learning disability" (Internal, Stable, Uncontrollable). In contrast, Marva Collins believed that "this child has not yet been taught to decode the word properly" or "this child is not yet applying sufficient mental effort" (Internal, Unstable, Controllable).
Consequently, she would not offer pity to the student. Instead, she would say to them, "You are so intelligent that you won't let that word defeat you," or "That is a nonsense word. What is the real word? Sound it out." She would teach her students and give them the patience to grow. She might have them write the word 25 times, not as punishment, but as a tangible strategy to gain control.
Conclusion
Marva Collins' pattern of attributions, consistently locating the causes of problems in controllable, changeable factors, was the engine of her success in her educational career. It shielded her from the discouragement of short-term setbacks and fueled a motivation that changed hundreds of lives. Her work demonstrates that the most powerful tool we have is not a curriculum or a policy, but the "why" we choose to believe. By consciously rejecting attributions that lead to hopelessness and embracing those that empower action, we can, as she proved, overcome the setbacks we faced. She taught us that as a teacher, before you can teach a child to read, you must first teach them, and also yourself, how to explain their struggles in a way that makes triumph inevitable.
Comments
Post a Comment